Lincoln: May the last days of the election bring hope for true democratic change

Read More

Quebec seeks to appeal court ruling on French-only election mailouts

Read More

Élections Québec has told employees not to speak English. Does that violate Anglos' rights?

Read More

Quebecers ‘hate referendums,’ federal minister Marc Miller says

Read More

French-only voter mailouts for Quebec election challenged in court

Read More

Lincoln: Amid wavering Liberal support, beware of the wolf in sheep’s clothing

Read More

Fréchette defends French-only voter mailings Élections Québec tried to avoid

Read More

Une municipalité de l’Outaouais dénonce l’absence d’un débat des chefs en anglais

Read More

Quebec will not remove English content from government websites, Roberge says

Read More

Anglophones et nationalistes cherchent une « voie de passage »

Read More

The problem with how Quebec decides who gets English services

Read More
The Gazette — September 3, 2026

Hanes: Quebec’s French-only voter information cards undermine democracy

Opinion

Like gerrymandering in the U.S., it could be viewed as an attempt to to disenfranchise some voters, in this case anglos.

 

The practice of gerrymandering — or manipulating electoral boundaries to the unfair advantage of one group or party — has a long history in the United States.

The term was first coined in the early 1800s because the rejigged districts mandated by Massachusetts Governor Eldridge Gerry were said to resemble a salamander, and an editorial cartoon in the Boston Gazette about his hijinks depicted him as the amphibian.

More than two centuries later, the nomenclature lives on, and so does the vote-consolidation scheme. If anything, gerrymandering seems to have picked up steam lately as states like Texas, California, Louisiana, Florida and Virginia expedite updates to their electoral maps that are typically done every decade.

While the group or party tinkering with the scales to tip them in their own favour vary from place to place, the effect is the same everywhere: it’s an attempt to disenfranchise certain voters (often Black, marginalized or poor) and dilute the weight of their will at the ballot box.

You Might Also Like

Follow Us

Stay connected

We have lots to talk about.

Menu